Wednesday, January 19, 2011

[EQ] Emerging and Transitioning Countries' Role in Global Health

Emerging and Transitioning Countries' Role in Global Health

Jennifer Prah Ruger, Associate Professor at Yale University at the Schools of Public Health, Medicine, and Graduate School of Arts and Sciences and Adjunct faculty at the Law School.
and Nora Y. Ng, Research assistant
Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law & Policy, 2010; 3:253-289

Available online PDF [38p.] at: http://bit.ly/hRee4e


“…..Global health scholarship has failed to adequately consider the “BRIC” cluster of nations—Brazil, Russia, India and China—particularly in the aggregate. An article search with the keywords “BRIC” and “public health” yields just one publication. But these countries have a unique role to play in the global health enterprise by addressing global health problems as they build their own health systems and help developing countries improve their populations’ health.

Moreover, the BRIC nations are becoming increasingly important components of the global health architecture, individually as nations and collectively as a nexus of influence. In June 2009, the countries held the first-ever BRIC summit in Yekaterinburg, Russia, debuting as a policy consultation and coordination group.1

What these countries collectively have to offer in the quest to improve global health merits attention. This article focuses on the role of emerging and transitioning countries as actors in
(1) providing financial assistance to lower-income countries;
(2) supplying medical goods and services to the developing world;
(3) giving technical assistance;
(4) improving access to medicines and intellectual property;
(5) modeling effective health-sector framework-building to less developed countries;
(6) delivering object lessons learned from the health and development process;
(7) helping lower-income countries grow their economies and reduce poverty;
(8) taking a significant role in global health governance; and
(9) bolstering the link between health and foreign policy.

For all their growing power and potential, however, they are still emerging and transforming countries with their own daunting and persisting health challenges that require continuing assistance from the global health community….”

“…..This article describes the roles that emerging countries play in global health, as the givers and recipients of aid. It outlines the types of assistance emerging countries can render to less developed states, as well as the sort of help emerging countries still need from the global health community. We also contemplate the effect of their participation in global health governance and their influence on health and foreign policy. Emerging countries—especially the incipient world powers Brazil, Russia, India, and China—are in an interesting position.

Their still-transforming economies and health systems connect them directly to the concerns of the developing world, while their growing economic and political clout give them a place at the table with industrialized countries and a more powerful voice in global affairs. The emergence of the BRIC countries as global health actors may direct greater attention to the needs and perspectives of developing countries…..”

 *      *     *
This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMC Area]
Washington DC USA

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website

Equity List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html
Twitter http://twitter.com/eqpaho






IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended
recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or
confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient or a person responsible for delivering this
transmission to the intended recipient, you may not
disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take
any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission
in error, please dispose of and delete this transmission.

Thank you.

[EQ] Global Consensus for Social Accountability of Medical Schools

Global Consensus for Social Accountability of Medical Schools

December 2010

English PDF at: http://bit.ly/fw4ofp

Spanish PDF at: http://bit.ly/fH6Kha

“….The beginning of the 20th century presented medical schools with unprecedented challenges to become more scientific and effective in the creation of physicians. This was captured in the Flexner report of 1910. The 21st Century presents medical schools with a different set of challenges: improving quality, equity, relevance and effectiveness in health care delivery; reducing the mismatch with societal priorities; redefining roles of health professionals; and providing evidence of impact on people’s heath status.

To address those challenges 130 organizations and individuals from around the world with responsibility for health education, professional regulation and policymaking participated for eight months in a three-round Delphi process leading to a three-day facilitated consensus development conference.

The Consensus consists of ten strategic directions for medical schools to become socially accountable, highlighting required improvements to:

• Respond to current and future health needs and challenges in society

• Reorient their education, research and service priorities accordingly

• Strengthen governance and partnerships with other stakeholders

• Use evaluation and accreditation to assess performance and impact

It recommends synergy among existing networks and organizations to move the consensus into action at global level, with a number of tasks:

• Advocacy to recognize the value of the global consensus

• Consultancy to adapt and implement it in different contexts

• Research to design standards reflecting social accountability

• Global coordination to share experiences and support…”

 

[“…..The GCSA has been co-hosted by the University of British Columbia and Walter Sisulu University, and held in conjunction with the 25th Anniversary Celebration of Walter Sisulu School of Medicine, one of the premier examples of a socially accountable medical school. We are thankful for the support of the World Health Organization (WHO), TheNET network of medical schools, Société Internationale Francophone d’Education Médicale (SIFEM), and the World Federation of Medical Education (WFME).
The GCSA conference was made possible by the generous support of a grant from Atlantic Philanthropy….]

 *      *     *
This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMC Area]
Washington DC USA

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website

Equity List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html
Twitter http://twitter.com/eqpaho







IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended
recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or
confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient or a person responsible for delivering this
transmission to the intended recipient, you may not
disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take
any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission
in error, please dispose of and delete this transmission.

Thank you.

[EQ] Survey about health and health inequalities in the European Union

What does Eurostat’s Labour Force Survey say about
health and health inequalities in the European Union?

 

Stefano Mazzuco, Department of Statistics, Padua University, Italy

Marc Suhrcke, School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom
World Health Organization 2010-  The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization

Available online PDF [96p.] at: http://bit.ly/hNTL66

 

“…..This publication presents extensive analysis of newly available data from Eurostat’s Labour Force Survey (LFS) to measure health and socioeconomic inequalities in health in 25 European countries, in a period including 1983–2004 at most.

The study first defined several, predominantly labour market-related health indicators plus one weighted, overall health index. The authors documented the limitations of using this information for the measurement of average national health status, and focused on the use of the health information for the assessment of socioeconomic inequalities in health. Standard concentration indices were calculated using fi ve different proxies for socioeconomic status.

 

After decomposing the inequality data into its trend and seasonal component, health inequalities were found to have been increasing for most but by no means all countries and health indicators. These results do not appear to be sensitive to the various proxies for socioeconomic status employed.

Overall, while not without problems, the Labour Force Survey LFS may well add a useful and hitherto unexploited resource for measuring socioeconomic inequalities in health across European countries and over time…..”

 

Content
Executive summary

1. Introduction

2. Related literature

3. Description of the Labour Force Survey LFS data

4. A first look at our data

5. A second look at our data

6. Socioeconomic inequalities in health

7. Concluding remarks

References

Annex 1. Average health indices by country and sex

Annex 2. Health inequality indices by country and sex


 *      *     *
This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate
information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic
health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;
Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ KMC Area]
Washington DC USA

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings
and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American
Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAHO/WHO Website

Equity List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html
Twitter http://twitter.com/eqpaho






IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended
recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or
confidential information. If you are not the intended
recipient or a person responsible for delivering this
transmission to the intended recipient, you may not
disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take
any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission
in error, please dispose of and delete this transmission.

Thank you.